“Cool Japan” is a new public diplomacy program focused on
the promotion Japanese pop culture. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA)
promotes various elements of Japanese subculture including pop music and
fashion. The two most famous cultural components are anime and manga. Cool Japan is an intelligent move by MOFA. As
Nakamura writes, the government was able to harness the already existing popularity
of anime and manga comics. From this perspective, the program has been
successful in promoting attractive aspects of modern Japanese culture. Japan
appointed the character Doraemon as an Anime Ambassador. Many American
bookstores feature manga sections, which is an important indicator of
popularity. Considering the domination of Hollywood films and English-language
music on the radio, the U.S. entertainment market is not an easy one to break
into.
Another piece of evidence in support of Cool Japan is the ability
of pop culture to generate further interest in Japan. Kenjiro Monji, former
director of the Public Diplomacy Department of MOFA said interest in anime and
manga inspires fans to study the Japanese language. Furthermore, some fans
travel to Japan to visit the sites from their favorite comics or films. In this
way, Cool Japan serves as a gateway to greater exploration of Japanese culture. Nakamura also quotes
Joseph Nye, who says that a country that utilizes popular channels of
communication is more likely to be successful in spreading its messages. Cool
Japan leverages its public diplomacy initiatives by appealing to the general
public, which is highly effective in terms of the new public diplomacy.
Nakamura writes that some critics find fault with Cool Japan
because of its limited appeal. While anime might have many fans, there are just
as many people who might find it “frivolous.” This isn’t the most compelling
argument, since the same thing could be said about any cultural program in any
country. Also, Nakamura focuses his article on anime and manga, which do
attract a specific fan base. But there are other aspects of Japanese pop
culture that attract different audiences. The newest initiative
from Cool Japan will be recreating parts of Tokyo in other cities around
the world. This will be no small feat. But even a handful of “Little Tokyo’s”
would introduce foreign audiences to a more conventional slice of life in
Japan.
So far we can see
that Cool Japan has been successful at generating interest in Japanese culture
and highlighting the country’s distinctive elements. However, these aren’t
Japan’s only diplomatic objectives. Japan wants to demonstrate leadership in
international affairs, which includes earning a permanent spot on the UN
Security Council, and disseminate a peaceful national image. It is unclear as
to whether Cool Japan has the capacity to increase Japan’s soft power to the
point of fulfilling these goals.
Nakamura and Kenijo
described one argument for Cool Japan as an indicator of leadership. Some
Japanese public diplomacy practitioners believe that developing countries, for
example Iraq, are interested in emulating Japan’s postwar comeback. According
to this view, such countries admire Japan for its ability to modernize while
still retaining its culture. Kenijo considers that malleability to be a
strength of Japanese culture. That’s an interesting point, but it’s probably
not the type of leadership the Security Council regards most highly when
evaluating potential new members.
Interestingly enough, while Ogawa writes that Japan sees itself
as a source of inspiration for this reason, it is Japan’s very postwar
“comeback” that presents a major soft power problem in places like China and
South Korea. As Nakamura details, it remains very controversial as to whether
Japan issued a proper official apology for its wartime aggressions. This is no
small soft power obstacle. Anime and J-pop are fun, maybe even enlightening,
but they can’t erase the memories of war. Cool Japan is not enough to realize
Japan’s major public diplomacy goals. If Japan wants to be seen as an
international leader of harmony and peace, it must atone for its conduct in
World War II with an apology and leadership in humanitarian issues. Until then,
Cool Japan will only generate a more superficial soft power based mostly on
commercial entertainment.
Okay, I have to show my young age and my experience to this "Cool Japan" phenomenon. I definitely agree that Japan has had a very difficult time translating these soft power initiatives into enough attraction to carry large sway when it comes to more hardline issues or affiliations (which is what a lot of nations are having trouble with) but I think that Japan has done one of the best jobs of wielding this soft power for purposes of cultural influence.
ReplyDeleteCase in point: Pokemon. I realize it is part of the anime/manga sensation that has left a substantial imprint on many cultures (including the US), but I think we need to take into consideration not just the breadth but the depth of this particular piece of cultural diplomacy. Pokemon became a HUGE success that was able to express some aspects of Japanese culture while still resonating with American audiences. This is difficult to do, given the large cultural differences between West and East, and especially in a Western dominated entertainment arena.
I can't help but think about the creation of hybrid cultural products, and how that can be a form of cultural diplomacy. Pokemon was not ridden with what Koichi Iwabuchi would call "cultural odor" or characteristics that were so uniquely Japanese that it wouldn't translate well anywhere else. No, this product was credited with being Japanese, but with a very Westernized makeover so that those audiences would understand it.
The result was a large swath of youth that became extremely interested in Japan via this entertaining cultural ambassador. Realizing this, Japan has done a lot to play up this success, including the building of a Poke Theme Park and multiple Pokemon centers within Japan as a tourist attraction.
I think that if this strategy of hybrid cultural products could be utilized more then I think we would see soft power strategies being more well received. It is difficult for nations to do this because they may be giving up some of their own cultural integrity, but in the game of attraction and influence this flexibility to create something new and culturally odorless could be key.